Assessment reports>Babylon Chain>Low findings>Vigilante makes an unnecessary report to Babylon
Category: Coding Mistakes

Vigilante makes an unnecessary report to Babylon

Low Severity
Low Impact
Low Likelihood

Description

The vigilante module's atomicslasher component detects selective slashing by finality providers. It does this in the following way:

  1. In every block, it searches for transaction hashes that match tracked delegation slashing TX hashes.

  2. If one is found, it treats it as selective slashing anyway and reports it to the Babylon chain using the MsgSelectiveSlashingEvidence message.

This works fine because there are only two scenarios here:

  1. The finality provider actually selectively slashed a delegator, in which case the MsgSelectiveSlashingEvidence execution on Babylon will succeed.

  2. The finality provider equivocated and was slashed previously, in which case the MsgSelectiveSlashingEvidence execution on Babylon will revert because the FP will have already been slashed on Babylon through the MsgAddFinalitySig handler + the BeginBlocker.

Impact

The issue here is that the vigilante technically does not need to report the evidence in the second case, because the finality provider has already been slashed due to a different offence.

This leads to the vigilante essentially wasting gas trying to report to Babylon.

Since the vigilante is run by Babylon validators and finality providers, they end up losing some gas, which we will assume is medium in severity.

However, this issue will not occur often. Finality providers are not expected to perform an equivocation offence often, and so the likelihood of this occurring is low.

Therefore, the impact from this issue is also considered to be low.

Recommendations

Add a check to the vigilante's atomicslasher component. Ensure that the finality provider being reported has not already been slashed prior to reporting selective slashing evidence to Babylon.

Remediation

Tracked by https://github.com/babylonchain/vigilante/issues/224

Zellic © 2025Back to top ↑